My Common Sense Politics
Posted by Preston James, Ph.D
on March 1, 2015
Nuclear Crimes beyond imagination have been committed by a Foreign Power inside America with the assistance of some Members of Congress and High USG Officials
Aiding and abetting any nation in the secret development of nuclear weapons is a Crime under two different US Laws and also constitutes Treason, Sedition and Espionage for aiding a foreign power which is running a covert war to asset strip America and destroy it.
And there are numerous other US Laws which have been egregiously violated by top USG Officials some of which are Israeli-American “Israeli-first” Dual Citizens who are serving the interests of the foreign nation Israel and have thereby shown divided loyalty to America and primary loyalty to Israel.
This divided loyalty has certainly been used to manipulate America intio fighting wars for Israel and the induced mass-death, mass wounding, and mass-disabling of wonderful American Soldiers all for nothing but Israel. It is time for Israel to fight its own wars and leave American Foreign Policy alone and to quite buying, bribing, blackmailing and human compromising our Members of Congress and so many other USG Officials at all levels.
Enough is enough and this must be ended immediately! All we have to do is enforce the existing American Laws!
This divided loyalty by these Dual Citizens who place their loyalty to Israel first is an incredibly serious violation of various US Laws and should no longer be permitted. Obviously now is the is the time to start enforcing American Law, restore the Rule of Law, and stop all the tampering of these Dual Citizens with American Foreign Policy.
Sadly so many USG Officials and Members of Congress, various US Intel Agencies have either aided and abetted, or made sure to remain looking the other way even when they knew there was iron-clad proof of the theft of US owned nuclear materials which were used to stage a nuclear attack on America on 9-11-01.
The rampant corruption of our American Political System by these Dual Citizens who are supported by the unlimited FIAT Counterfeit Money by the Rothschild Franchisee the illegal Unconstitutional Federal Reserve System must be immediately stopped and this monstrosity which calls itself “The Fed” which is no more Federal than Federal Express.
“The Fed” must be completely nationalized, all fake national debt owed to “The Fed” must be clawed all the way back to its first bank inside America. Remember there is no statute of limitations on major Financial crime against We The People like this which is the largest asset stripping Counterfeiting and pernicious usury scheme ever conceived or deployed.
And besides the Federal Reserve Act was never properly passed because there was no required quorum present. And besides that this law is so blatantly illegal and Unconstitutional that is is void upon its face according to existing US Law.
All the assets of the top Directors and owners of “The Fed” must be clawed back to the very origin and redistributed to the American people. And this includes all the massive illegal earnings gained through their very crafty MERS fraud, engineered mortgage bubble and simultaneously engineered deep recession.
Here is a list of the various Crimes associated with this Nuclear Treason, Sedition and RICO which lead to the Nuclear Attack on America on 9-11-01. Rock solid evidence based on the AEC, Sandia Labs and the Able Danger Investigations has surfaced, and we now know who did it, how they did it and why.
- Aiding any foreign entity in the acquisition of nuclear weapons or weapons technology who has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Agreement, the Symington Agreement Section 101 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA). It is entirely prohibited by the Symington Amendment to give any kind of foreign aid in the acquisition of nuclear weapons or weapon building technology to any state that has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
- Any Foreign Government that illegally acquires or transfers nuclear reprocessing technology or explodes or transfers a nuclear device, Glenn Amendment 22 United States Code Section 2429. The Glenn Amendment (Section 670) was later adopted in 1977, and provided the same sanctions against countries that acquire or transfer nuclear reprocessing technology or explode or transfer a nuclear device. This provision, as amended, is now contained in Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA).
- Conferring with a foreign government by a Citizen of the USA without authorization by the USG, the Logan Act 18 United States Code Section 953. The Logan Act is a single Federal Statute making it a crime for a citizen to confer with foreign governments against the interests of the United States. Specifically, it prohibits citizens from negotiating with other nations on behalf of the United States without authorization. The text of the Logan Act: “Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.” This Logan Act especially applies to Israel-American “Israeli-first” Dual Citizens who go to Israel and serve in the IDF and then come back to America, or any such Dual Citizen that lobbies on Israel’s behalf, works for an Israeli espionage front like AIPAC, JINSA, the ADL, Bnai Brith, etc. It’s time to fully enforce the Logan Act and put a stop to Dual Citizens serving another nation that they are Citizens of as their first loyalty.
- RICO Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 – Sections 1961-1968. In 1978, Congress enacted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, providing prosecutors with the tool they needed to fight organized crime. Many states have enacted similar laws. In order to convict someone under RICO or a state equivalent, it’s no longer necessary to prove the suspect personally committed an illegal activity. Instead, prosecutors must prove: The defendant owns and/or manages an organization; The organization regularly performs one or more specific illegal activity.
- Misprision of a Felony, 18 United Sates Code § 4, “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.” When any Whistle-blower or member of the American Public provides a complaint or a request to any USG Official, LE person or elected Member of Congress, that person has a legal obligation to undertake a reasonable investigation to that complaint or any evidence so provided. To ignore such can be a felony itself under this law.
- Aiding and Abetting in a Felony, 18 United States Code 2, which visits the same consequences on anyone who orders or assists in the commission of a federal crime. Aiding and abetting means assisting in the commission of someone else’s crime. Section 2(a) demands that the defendant embrace the crime of another and consciously do something to contribute to its success. An accomplice must know the offense is a foot if he is to intentionally contribute to its success. While a completed offense is a prerequisite to conviction for aiding and abetting, the hands-on offender need be neither named nor convicted.
- Accessory after a Crime, 18 U.S. Code § 3 – Accessory after the fact. “Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.”
- Treason against America, 18 U.S. Code § 2381. Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
- Sedition against America, 18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy. “If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”
- Espionage against America, Title 18, United States Code Chapter 37 and 18 U.S.C. § 792 et seq. This is the serious crime of spying against the United States of America inside America on behalf of a foreign nation, or delivering classified American defense information to a foreign entity. This can be a Capital Offense.
- Operating as a Foreign Agent of Espionage, or engaging in illegal spying inside America, Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA). The purpose of FARA is to insure that the U.S. government and the people of the United States are informed of the source of information (propaganda) and the identity of persons attempting to influence U.S. public opinion, policy, and laws. Failure to register can be grounds for immediate deportation and if espionage has been done against the USA inside of the USA, Perps can be prosecuted for espionage which can be a Capital Offense.
- Unauthorized, illegal transportation of nuclear material, 18 U.S. Code § 831 – Prohibited transactions involving nuclear materials. Upon conviction the sentence for this crime can be life imprisonment.
- Acts of Terrorism inside America by a foreign entity, 18 U.S. Code § 2332b – Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries. A Capital Offense which can be punishable by execution upon conviction. We now have 100% rock solid evidence that all World Terrorism is synthetic and is actually due to a big Worldwide Organized Crime Problem and is pre-engineered and used to start and justify numerous, illegal, Unconstitutional, unprovoked, undeclared, perpetual, unwinnable wars.
- Acts of Terrorism inside America by an American Citizen or a Dual Citizen whose main allegiance is to a Foreign Nation-state, USA PATRIOT Act (H.R. 3162).
- Support provided to a foreign entity for acts of Terror abroad, USA PATRIOT Act, Tit. VIII § 805 creates new felony crimes for providing any financial support of terrorism or terrorists abroad.
- Domestic Terrorism, is defined exactly the same as international terrorism, except that the violent acts are committed within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.18 U.S.C. § 2331(5). This can be a Capital Crime punishable by Execution.
- Money Structuring or Money Laundering of funds taken illegally or from illegal weapons or illegal narcotics trafficking, 18 U.S.C. 1956 in regard to illegal narcotics trafficking, illegal weapons trafficking, illegal organ trafficking, or for support of Domestic or Foreign Terrorism. Section 1956 outlaws four kinds of money laundering, promotional, concealment, structuring, and tax evasion, laundering of the proceeds generated by designated Federal, State, and foreign underlying crimes (predicate offenses)—committed or attempted under one or more of three jurisdictional conditions (i.e., laundering involving certain financial transactions, laundering involving international transfers, and stings). All related assets of the Perps can be confiscated before they go to trial.
- Taking Bribes by an Elected Official or other USG Official, or Bribing an Elected Official or other USG Official, 18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses. “The first crime, described in §201(b)(1) as to the giver, and §201(b)(2) as to the recipient, is bribery, which requires a showing that something of value was corruptly given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver) or corruptly demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient) with intent, inter alia, “to influence any official act” (giver) or in return for “being influenced in the performance of any official act” (recipient). The second crime, defined in §201(c)(1)(A) as to the giver, and §201(c)(1)(B) as to the recipient, is illegal gratuity, which requires a showing that something of value was given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver), or demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient), “for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official.” The distinguishing feature of each crime is its intent element. Bribery requires intent “to influence” an official act or “to be influenced” in an official act, while illegal gratuity requires only that the gratuity be given or accepted “for or because of” an official act. In other words, for bribery there must be a quid pro quo, that is, a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act. An illegal gratuity, on the other hand, may constitute merely a reward for some future act that the public official will take (and may already have determined to take), or for a past act that he has already taken.” Note most bribes taken today by Members of Congress and other High USG Officials are promises of revolving door jobs before separation, absurdly lucrative honorariums for foolish or stupid speeches, payment to foreign numbers banks accounts defined as “Set-aside Allocations”, gifts of reduced interest home mortgages, sales of expensive items, businesses or homes at unrealistically steep discounts, etc. We now know for sure that those dirty Politicians and USG Officials often are distinctively two-faced and the description of “Evil with a nice face” fits them perfectly.
- The Federal Felony crime of Murder of a Federal Officer or Employee of the USG, 18 U.S. Code § 1114 – Protection of officers and employees of the United States. Whoever kills or attempts to kill any officer or employee of the United States or of any agency in any branch of the United States Government (including any member of the uniformed services) while such officer or employee is engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties, or any person assisting such an officer or employee in the performance of such duties or on account of that assistance. This can be a Capital Crime.
- Assaulting, kidnapping or Murdering an Elected or appointed USG Official, 18 U.S.C. § 111. This can be a Capital Crime. The Khazarian mafia has ordered t these crimes against numerous USG Officials including Representative Larry McDonald, Governor Carnahan, former Senator John Tower, John Kennedy Jr. and Senator Paul Wellstone to mention the most prominent murders. Some USG officials have been “disappeared.”
- Assassination of a US President 18 U.S. Code Chapter 84. This is a Capital Crime. The Bush Crime Cabal was responsible for this and operated under the general authority and orders of the Khazarian Mafia (KM) aka the City of London Rothschild World Zionist private FIAT Central Banksters because JFK was denying Israel the Nuclear Bomb technology and was getting rid of the Federal reserve System and its notes.
- Premeditated Murder of anyone inside America, This is typically a State Offense and each state may have different sentencing guidelines upon conviction.
- Murder of an American Civilian inside America involving Terrorism 18 U.S. Code § 2332b – Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries. This can be a Capital Offense.
- Mass Murder of an American Civilian inside America involving Terrorism 18 U.S. Code § 2332b – Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries. This can be a Capital Offense.
- Cyber Terrorism against certain American Institutions 18 U.S.C. 1030, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), , outlaws conduct that victimizes computer systems. It is a cyber security law. It protects federal computers, bank computers, and computers connected to the Internet. It shields them from trespassing, threats, damage, espionage, and from being corruptly used as instruments of fraud. It is not a comprehensive provision, but instead it fills cracks and gaps in the protection afforded by other federal criminal laws.
- Cyber Crime and hacking of one’s computer inside America, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), enacted by Congress in 1986 18 U.S.C. §1030 as amended.
- Conspiracy to commit the Cyber-crime of hacking of one’s computer, 18 U.S.C. § 1030(b).
- Cyber-stalking and Stalking as harassment of Whistle-blowers, Federal Whistle-blowers Act/Judicial act 31 US Code 3729 through 3732.
- Blackmail of a USG or Elected USG Official, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 41 – EXTORTION AND THREATS. This includes the offense of the Israeli’s nuclear blackmail (Samson Option) to coerce Bush2 to promote the Israeli’s efforts to get Congress to pass the act authorizing the creation of Homeland Security. DHS was deigned to serve as Israel’s own private Police State Occupation army insie America, patterned after the East German Stasi by Marcus Wolfe the former head of the Stasi who was hired as a consultant to set up DHS as a Secret Police patterned after the much feared Stasi.
- Terroristic Threats, 18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines “international terrorism” and “domestic terrorism” for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled “Terrorism.” Note that each individual State has it own version of this law which outlaws Terroristic threats made to anyone inside that State.
- Organized Pedophilia, 18 U.S. Code § 2251 – Sexual exploitation of children. Note that each state has it own statutes and sentences upon conviction for this offense and these are in addition to this Federal Statute.
- Sex Trafficking, Mann Act, is a United States federal law, passed June 25, 1910 (ch. 395, 36 Stat. 825; codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421–2424).
- Illegal Narcotics Trafficking, 21 U.S.C. 841 (drug trafficking). Note that each individual state also has statutes making this a crime with their own sentences upon conviction.
A Rogue’s Gallery of serious offenders of the above US Codes lies within the US Congress and High Positions within the USG.
Monday, 02 March 2015
A plan to base F-35 fighter bombers in Burlington, Vermont, has been sent into a tailspin, due to contradicting government information about their safety.
A F-35A Lightning II 002 jet plane. (Photo: Airman Magazine; edited: LW / TO)
Charts released by the Department of Defense Joint Strike Fighter Program Office (JSF) contradict information given by the Vermont Air National Guard, throwing the plan by Vermont political and military leaders (1) to base F-35 fighter bombers in Burlington into a tailspin. The charts (2) show that the cumulative hours the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office anticipates will be flown by F-35A jets before the jets arrive for basing in Burlington is a fraction of the number the Vermont Air National Guard says will be flown to assure safety.
In response to concerns about the high accident rate typical for all new jet fighters, Lt. Col. Chris Caputo, an F-16 pilot, squadron commander, and now head of the Vermont Air National Guard's F-35 Integration Office, held a news conference in October 2013 about F-35A basing, where he announced, "There will be 750,000 flight hours before it comes to Burlington."
The Air Force Record of Decision states that 18 F-35A aircraft are "anticipated to start arriving [at Burlington Air Guard Station] in 2020." Making the date more specific, on May 2, 2014, Col. TJ Jackman, Commander of the Vermont Air National Guard 158th Fighter Wing told WPTZ TV that "eighteen F-35s will arrive in Burlington in June 2020."
According to the authoritative Joint Strike Fighter Program Office charts, the F-35A will only have a fraction of the flight hours specified by Lt. Col. Caputo by the end of FY2020.
The charts were released by the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. The charts show that the JSF anticipates that:
• The Air Force version of the F-35 that will be based in Burlington, called the "F-35A," will have only 248,250 cumulative aircraft flying hours by the end of fiscal year 2020 (page 1), one-third of the number of hours stated by the Vermont Air National Guard.
• All three versions of the F-35 together - the F-35A plus the very different Marine F-35B and the Navy F-35C - will have only 437,386 fleet flight hours by the end of FY 2020 (page 6), only 58 percent of the number of hours stated by the Vermont Air National Guard.
Information provided by the Air Force in its final environmental impact statement (EIS) comparing F-15, F-16 and F-22 fighter jets shows that in their first few hundred thousand hours of flying, all these jet fighters have an extremely high accident rate. But by 1 to 2 million cumulative flight hours, enough learning and fixes were implemented so the accident rate of the F-15 and F-16 declined substantially.
An article in the Burlington Free Press by Sam Hemingway, "Final F-35 environmental impact statement released, Statement contains information on crash risks, noise levels" September 26, 2013, brings more vividly to life the information on page 3-28 of the Final EIS:
According to a chart added to the final report, four F-16s crashed in fiscal 2012 during a 207,158 flight hours, compared to 17 crashes in calendar year 1982 during 107,343 flight hours.
F-16 jets had flown fewer than 100,000 flight hours when 1982 began. They had accumulated over 9 million fleet flight hours before 2012 began. The crash rate in 1982 was 11.5 times greater than the crash rate in 2012.
By contrast, the F-22 has so far accumulated fewer than 200,000 flight hours, and its FY2012 accident rate was 8.2 times the FY2012 accident rate of the F-16. This is why responsible military officials will normally require at least 1 million fleet flight hours to assure that a new jet fighter is safe to base in a densely populated area, such as Burlington Vermont. Interestingly, the Air Force EIS says that the F-35 accident rate is expected to be like that of the F-22.
To its credit, the Air Force did not base F-16 jets at the Burlington airport until 1986, during which year the chart in the EIS shows that the F-16 reached its first million flight hours. Enough learning and fixes had been implemented so the F-16 accident rate was reduced nearly 4 fold from the rate in 1982. Even so, the accident rate was still well above the current F-16 accident rate, with its 9 million accumulated fleet flight hours.
The airport in Burlington, where Senator Leahy is leading the drive to base the new F-35A jets, is completely surrounded by residential neighborhoods. Unlike military air bases that are adjacent very large open areas, the Burlington International Airport, a commercial airport shared with the Vermont National Guard, has no open area in any direction near the airport. Some 124,000 people live in the seven towns on all sides and within eight miles of the airport in the most densely populated part of Vermont.
The runway at Burlington airport aims directly at the center of one of these towns, Winooski, with over 7,000 people only one mile from the end of the runway.
In the opposite direction, the runway aims directly at the largest shopping area in Vermont, with two dozen big-box stores one mile away in Williston. Long ago, a military jet crashed in the very area of those stores, killing the two Vermont Air National Guard pilots. But back then, the entire area was an open field.
Tue, Mar 3rd, 2015
US and Israel attempting to establish feigned “diplomatic row” to justify “unilateral” Israeli attack on Iran.
In a 2009 US policy paper published by the corporate-financier funded Brookings Institution, it was made clear that the US was determined to provoke Iran into a conflict and effect regime change at any cost – up to and including an outright military invasion and occupation of Iran with US troops.
However, before it came to that, the Brookings Institution’s policymakers explored other options including fomenting US-backed political unrest coupled with covert, violent force, the use of US State Department listed foreign terrorist organizations to carry out assassinations and attacks within Iran, and limited airstrikes carried out by either the US or Israel, or both.
In retropspect, 6 years on, all of these tricks have not only been attempted to one degree or another in Iran, but have been demonstrably employed in neighboring Syria to diminish its strength – which according to Brookings – is a necessary prerequisite before waging war on Iran.
And of particular interest – considering what appears to be a growing diplomatic row between the United States and Israel – is just how precisely the US planned to covertly back what would be made to appear as a “unilateral” Israeli first strike on Iran – an attack that appears to be in the process of being justified through a carefully orchestrated propaganda campaign now unfolding.
From the Mouths of US Policymakers Themselves
The Brookings Institution’s 2009 policy paper titled, “Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy Toward Iran,” makes clear that negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program is merely theater, and that it will be used to give the world the impression that the United States explored all possible “peaceful” options before resorting to violent regime change. The report states specifically that:
…any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context— both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal.
Of course, Iran – as admitted to by Brookings themselves – is not governed by irrational leadership, and would not turn down a genuinely “superb offer.” The Brookings Institution admits openly that the US pursues a dual track foreign policy – one for public consumption (making “superb offers”) and another aimed at ensuring Iran looks as unreasonable as possible. At one point in the policy paper, Brookings would state:
The truth is that these all would be challenging cases to make. For that reason, it would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be. Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it. (One method that would have some possibility of success would be to ratchet up covert regime change efforts in the hope that Tehran would retaliate overtly, or even semi-overtly, which could then be portrayed as an unprovoked act of Iranian aggression.)
Sun, Mar 1st, 2015
The President of the Iraqi parliament’s National Security and Defense Committee, Al-Zameli, claimed that the armed forces of Iraq downed a British plane that was carrying weapons to the Islamic State, a.k.a. ISIS or ISIL.
Al-Zameli’s statement followed reports in US and UK media about the downing of a British plane in Iraq’s Al-Anbar province, reports the Turkish Aydinlik Daily. The President of the Parliamentary National Security and Defense Committee reportedly asked the British government to explain the incident.
Al-Zameli referred to testimony from residents of Iraq’s Al-Anbar province who provided information that supports the claims that the United States and the United Kingdom are, in fact, supporting and arming ISIS.
Al-Zameli stressed that the United States wants to maintain a chaotic environment in the Al-Anbar province and that they are arming ISIS to achieve that objective. He concluded that the downing of the plane resulted in the discovery of U.S., European as well as Israeli weapons for the insurgents.
It is noteworthy that ISIS began its aggression in Iraq’s Al-Anbar province when the former Iraqi PM Al-Maliki deployed Iraqi troops to the Al-Anbar province in late 2012, after old smuggling routes from Saudi Arabia to Iraq were reopened to smuggle troops, weapons, munitions and logistic supplies via Iraq to insurgents in Syria’s Deir Ez-Zour province.
Besides resulting in clashes between the Iraqi armed forces and ISIS, the military campaign also forced the re-routing of the supplies via Jordan, which in turn resulted in protests by Jordanian members of parliament.
Several analysts assessed that the ousting of Al-Maliki was directly correlated to his unwillingness to provide free passage for the foreign-backed mercenary brigades from Saudi Arabia to Syria’s oil-rich Deir Ez-Zour province.
A person from within the inner circle around the former Lebanese PM Saad Hariri reported and provided evidence to nsnbc that the final decision to launch the invasion of Iraq with ISIS was made on the sidelines of the Atlantic Council’s Energy Summit in Turkey, in November 2013, and that the U.S. Embassy in Turkey led by Ambassador Riccardione functions as command or coordination hub.
Posted by Gordon Duff
on March 1, 2015
Normal people can't just make this stuff up...but who said Netanyahu is "normal?"
In a story in today’s Israel National News, Netanyahu claims he was forced to abort a planned tactical nuclear attack on Iran. According to a series of sources, a newspaper in Kuwait, a news service in “Bethlehem” and the ever faithful Israel National news, it is all true.Israel’s slated 2014 nuclear attack on Iran, to be launched from Azerbaijan using nuclear weapons landed at Poti, Georgia in 2010, was averted due to threats of US reprisals against Israel.
Despite continual denials by Azerbaijan, Israel has maintained, not only nuclear armed F15’s in Azerbaijan but a drone base as well.
Sources in the Ukraine indicate that combat aircraft from one of Israel’s two covert bases in Western Azerbaijan was in the vicinity of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 when it was shot down last year.
In a story by Mark Langfan, a convoluted tale involving a discussion with Secretary of State Kerry from either 2013 or 2014, somehow intermingled with statements that may or may not have been made by Carter national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in 2008, has hit the news prior to Netanyahu’s scheduled address to some members of the US Congress.
Framing the rambling and incoherent claim that so many wish was actually true is a curious reference to the 1967 attack by Israel on the USS Liberty. The article reiterates Israel’s absurd claim of innocence in the eleven hour attack involving torpedoes, napalm, over ten thousand rounds of cannon fire and an Israeli patrol boat seizing an American life raft as a souvenier. (still on display in Tel Aviv)
The current Israeli version of the bizarre tale of US treachery is published below, sourced to a government controlled news organization headquartered in Tel Aviv:
Report: Obama Threatened to Shoot Down IAF Iran Strike Kuwaiti paper claims unnamed Israeli minister with good ties with the US administration ‘revealed the attack plan to John Kerry.’
Following Obama’s threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack.
According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel’s back.
The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.
Al-Jarida quoted “well-placed” sources as saying that Netanyahu, along with Minister of Defense Moshe Yaalon, and then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, had decided to carry out airstrikes against Iran’s nuclear program after consultations with top security commanders.
According to the report, “Netanyahu and his commanders agreed after four nights of deliberations to task the Israeli army’s chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to prepare a qualitative operation against Iran’s nuclear program. In addition, Netanyahu and his ministers decided to do whatever they could do to thwart a possible agreement between Iran and the White House because such an agreement is, allegedly, a threat to Israel’s security.”
The sources added that Gantz and his commanders prepared the requested plan and that Israeli fighter jets trained for several weeks in order to make sure the plans would work successfully. Israeli fighter jets reportedly even carried out experimental flights in Iran’s airspace after they managed to break through radars.
Former US diplomat Zbigniew Brzezinski, who enthusiastically campaigned for Obama in 2008, called on him to shoot down Israeli planes if they attack Iran. “They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?” said the former national security advisor to former President Jimmy Carter in an interview with the Daily Beast.
“We have to be serious about denying them that right,” he said. “If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a ‘Liberty’ in reverse.’”
Israel mistakenly attacked the American Liberty ship during the Six-Day War in 1967.
Brzezinski was a top candidate to become an official advisor to President Obama, but he was downgraded after Republican and pro-Israel Democratic charges during the campaign that Brzezinski’s anti-Israel attitude would damage Obama at the polls.
Administrative Note: Speak out and "Mickey's Nazified Zionista Imperialism Machine" and you'll get targeted like Malaysia, France, Denmark, Venezuela, Argentina and other countries who critizes USA & Israeli actions. There should be a UN EMBARGO on Israel UNTILL they are ALL back within their 1967 borders. That will likely never happen unless people around the world demand declassification of 911 files linking Saudia Arabia, Israel MOSSAD and Washington's Corrupted Shaddow Government aided and enabled as co-conspiraters Criminal Mass Media Cia Controlled Corpwhorational Crapititalized Control Complex.
Until the 1% are judged like the 99% there will be no "LIBERTY" only continuation of "Liberty"
Sun, Mar 1st, 2015
Canada, once again playing the role of court jester to America’s imperial throne, has announced the same set of new sanctions against Russia that were announced by the EU and the USA a day after the Minsk agreement was signed. To add salt to the wound, this action was taken on the same day that the UN Security Council passed the Russian resolution supporting the Minsk agreement. Once again, the unctuous Canadian prime minister provided no justification for this illegal action except to parrot President Obama’s mantra of “Russian aggression.”
The Russian foreign ministry correctly stated in response that it was a “lame attempt” to prevent implementation of the ceasefire agreement. Foreign Ministry spokesman, Alexander Lukashevich, stated on February 18th that “Canada’s bet on sanctions will be definitely answered. However we hope that Ottawa will think about the consequences of its actions, which in fact fuel the further armed standoff in Ukraine, and realize that pressing Russia with sanctions has no perspectives”
The Canadian action is illegal under international law since Chapter VII, Article 41, of the UN Charter states that the power to impose sanctions rests solely with the UN Security Council. Further, Article 103 of Chapter XVI states that a member’s obligations under the UN Charter override their obligations under any other treaty and this includes the North Atlantic Treaty that created Nato. The Canadian government states that it relies for its action on the Special Economic Measures Act of 1992, but that law has to be applied so that it is not in violation of the UN Charter. Since it is obvious that the Harper government did not base its action on a resolution of the UN, the Canadian sanctions are illegal both under Canadian and international law.
This legal problem has not been raised by the Canadian press, or the major opposition parties, and the Canadian government completely ignores it. But then Canada, like the other Nato governments, has no respect for laws or morality when it serves the interests of the masters in the White House and the corporations hoping to descend like vultures onto the carcass of a prostrate Russia.
The hypocrisy of Canada’s action is highlighted by the revelation that Canada was involved in the plot to overthrow the government of Venezuela just the week before. On February 13 the president of Venezuela’s national assembly presented evidence of a right-wing plot to overthrow the Bolivarian government and stated that a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, attached to the Canadian embassy, was involved in trying to determine the security situation at the airport in Valencia. The officer was named as Nancy Birbeck, who according to a report in the Canadian press in 2009, was a sergeant in the RCMP and at that time was involved in investigations with the American FBI.
This would not be the first time Canada has been involved in attempting to overthrow governments. In 1999 Canada played a significant role in the aggression against Yugoslavia and supplied the war crimes prosecutor Louise Arbour to lay false charges against President Milosevic. In 1994 Canada, through Canadian general Romeo Dallaire, was involved in helping Paul Kagame’s RPF forces murder the two Hutu presidents of Rwanda and Burundi and launch its final offensive resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands. In 2004 Canadian commando units secured the airport for the American marines when they put a pistol to President Aristide’s head, kidnapped him and transported him in chains to Africa. The Canadians were useful idiots for the Americans since they speak French. Canada thereafter helped impose a dictatorial regime in Haiti and its federal police, the RCMP, were involved in arbitrary arrests of hundreds of political opponents of the US–Canadian installed regime. The Canadian role in the destruction of Libya is well known as is its role in the aggression against Afghanistan, and its current bombing of Iraq. Its oppression and cultural genocide of the first nations aboriginal peoples of Canada is a world scandal.
The role played by Canada in the Ukraine crisis is primarily a propaganda one. Its military forces, while well trained, effective and useful to the Americans in particular scenarios, are too small to matter on any meaningful scale. But its propaganda role is useful because Canada has portrayed itself over the years as a neutral, peaceful country full of nice, friendly people who would never offend anyone. So its actions against Russia serve to fool the naïve into thinking that if Canada is taking action then it must be justified.
But that is not the only reason it is involved. Canadian mining companies, many owned by American shareholders, are involved all over the world in searching for opportunities to grab what they can at the cheapest possible price come what may, from Asia to Africa, from Latin America to the Arctic. Now they have their eyes on the vast resources of Russia. They had hoped to exploit them freely when the government of the Soviet Union was replaced by the walking catastrophe that was Boris Yeltsin. But since the rise of the new leadership in Russia, once again aware of Russia’s potential, and its ability to defend its interests instead of selling them to the lowest bidder, the Canadian opportunists find those resources more difficult to access and are eager for the current Russian government to be replaced with one more easily controlled.
One of the prime examples of the types of people involved is the Canadian, Lenna Koszarney, a founding partner and chief financial officer of Horizon Capital that has its headquarters in Kiev. The other founding partner of Horizon Capital and its chief executive officer is Natalie Jaresko, the US imposed American finance minister of Ukraine. Horizon Capital manages the assets of Western NIS Enterprise Fund (WNISEF) a company created by the CIA front US Agency For International Development (USAID).
Posted by Preston James, Ph.D
on February 27, 2015
The US Department of State is in a complete tizzy-fit about Edward Snowden's disclosures of incredible NSA crimes and its Secret War against Americans and the World on behalf of their owners and controllers, the Khazarian Mafia Chieftains.
This US Department of State news conference by this slick very attractive lady who is lying through her teeth is one of the best examples of “Evil with a Nice Face” one could ever imagine.
Her little State Department performance actually sets a whole new standard for Evil with a Nice Face, and is a perfect example of that which was presented in Evil with a Nice Face Part I.
Yes, this very attractive US Department of State spokesperson is such a happy phony, good looking, slick, two-faced liar on behalf of the USG and the NSA, that no typical uninformed American News Consumer could never imagine that her command performance is designed deceive and conceal.
They are Obsessed with punishing Snowden for revealing their espionage and crimes against We The People.
The NSA and its partner in RICO crime and espionage, the US Department of State is obsessed with punishing and shutting Snowden up forever in a deep underground super-max prison. They are obsessed with getting Edward Snowden back in the US where he can be tried in a Kangaroo Court also known as a “national Security Court” with a hand-picked incredible biased Jury of either mind-kontrolled USG Koolaid drinkers or individuals adequately dirtied up.
These dirty “stacked” Juries are the type so often used by crooked US Prosecutors, many of whom themselves are known perpetrators operating as part of a large US Department of Justice RICO Crime Syndicate.
The US Department of Justice has been scared witless for years about Juries ever finding out about any Juror’s Constitutional Right of “Jury Nullification.” This is his/her right to vote not guilty if he/she thinks any law is morally wrong or the prosecution is unjust for any reason at all. When activists attempt to pass out Jury Nullification literature to folks entering or leaving Courthouses (which by the way is their Constitutional Right) they are almost forced to leave by Police threatening arrest or then are actually illegally arrested.
Jury Nullification is a Constitutional Right and soon all potential Jurors will know.
Soon the public knowledge of this Constitutional Right of Jury Nullification will be spreading like wildfire all over the Internet and every Juror will know about it even though all Judges prevent any attorney from mentioning it even though they are breaking the law to do so. No Jury of peers that was not cherry picked by dirty prosecutors would ever convict Snowden of anything if they knew their right to “Nullify.”
In the not too distant future, no convictions of any Snowden or recreational drug user will be possible.
Soon due to legalization of recreational pot use and the spreading of knowledge about the right of any Juror to use his/her nuclear option Jury Nullification, few recreational drug users will be able to be convicted at all. And this process will become even more salient as the public becomes informed of how many USG officials and the NSA are operating as a part of a large international Organized Crime cabal and also as a RICO crime syndicate, and must be brought to justice.
This is why our criminals in Congress and the USG worked so hard to get the illegal, Unconstitutional Patriot Act passed, so they could eliminate any right to a trial by Jury and just kidnap and incarcerate folks at Black Prison sites, never to be heard of again. Of course these Perps do not want this done to them, but maybe it should be at least for a while to give them a taste of their own sadism.
Snowden is not the Perp here who should be prosecuted for espionage, it’s the NSA!
Instead of being obsessed with prosecuting Snowden for whistle-blowing, how about getting obsessed with bringing all the NSA top Officials responsible for all this massive illegal Unconstitutional NSA spying and espionage against Americans to justice and final judgement with prejudice? This State Department spokesperson is expressing incredible hypocrisy and must be exposed for these “in your face” blatant lies and deceptions on behalf of the NSA and her controllers.
Yes, how about the US Department of Justice being cleaned out of its corrupts rats and then prosecuting the NSA Kingpins for massive espionage against Americans, and for their Treason, Sedition and RICO, all done on behalf of a foreign entity, the large Organized Crime Cabal, the Khazarian Mafia?
What was the real truth this State Department Spokesperson was concealing from the American People with her bald-faced Big Government Lies, Propaganda and False-narratives?
Fevruary 27, 2015
The FBI and major media outlets yesterday trumpeted the agency’s latest counterterrorism triumph: the arrest of three Brooklyn men, ages 19 to 30, on charges of conspiring to travel to Syria to fight for ISIS (photo of joint FBI/NYPD press conference, above). As my colleague Murtaza Hussain ably documents, “it appears that none of the three men was in any condition to travel or support the Islamic State, without help from the FBI informant.” One of the frightening terrorist villains told the FBI informant that, beyond having no money, he had encountered a significant problem in following through on the FBI’s plot: his mom had taken away his passport. Noting the bizarre and unhinged ranting of one of the suspects, Hussain noted on Twitter that this case “sounds like another victory for the FBI over the mentally ill.”
In this regard, this latest arrest appears to be quite similar to the overwhelming majority of terrorism arrests the FBI has proudly touted over the last decade. As my colleague Andrew Fishman and I wrote last month — after the FBI manipulated a 20-year-old loner who lived with his parents into allegedly agreeing to join an FBI-created plot to attack the Capitol — these cases follow a very clear pattern:
The known facts from this latest case seem to fit well within a now-familiar FBI pattern whereby the agency does not disrupt planned domestic terror attacks but rather creates them, then publicly praises itself for stopping its own plots.
First, they target a Muslim: not due to any evidence of intent or capability to engage in terrorism, but rather for the “radical” political views he expresses. In most cases, the Muslim targeted by the FBI is a very young (late teens, early 20s), adrift, unemployed loner who has shown no signs of mastering basic life functions, let alone carrying out a serious terror attack, and has no known involvement with actual terrorist groups.
They then find another Muslim who is highly motivated to help disrupt a “terror plot”: either because they’re being paid substantial sums of money by the FBI or because (as appears to be the case here) they are charged with some unrelated crime and are desperate to please the FBI in exchange for leniency (or both). The FBI then gives the informant a detailed attack plan, and sometimes even the money and other instruments to carry it out, and the informant then shares all of that with the target. Typically, the informant also induces, lures, cajoles, and persuades the target to agree to carry out the FBI-designed plot. In some instances where the target refuses to go along, they have their informant offer huge cash inducements to the impoverished target.
Once they finally get the target to agree, the FBI swoops in at the last minute, arrests the target, issues a press release praising themselves for disrupting a dangerous attack (which it conceived of, funded, and recruited the operatives for), and the DOJ and federal judges send their target to prison for years or even decades (where they are kept in special GITMO-like units). Subservient U.S. courts uphold the charges by applying such a broad and permissive interpretation of “entrapment” that it could almost never be successfully invoked.
Once again, we should all pause for a moment to thank the brave men and women of the FBI for saving us from their own terror plots.
One can, if one really wishes, debate whether the FBI should be engaging in such behavior. For reasons I and many others have repeatedly argued, these cases are unjust in the extreme: a form of pre-emptory prosecution where vulnerable individuals are targeted and manipulated not for any criminal acts they have committed but rather for the bad political views they have expressed. They end up sending young people to prison for decades for “crimes” which even their sentencing judges acknowledge they never would have seriously considered, let alone committed, in the absence of FBI trickery. It’s hard to imagine anyone thinking this is a justifiable tactic, but I’m certain there are people who believe that. Let’s leave that question to the side for the moment in favor of a different issue.
Sat, Feb 28th, 2015
The announcement this week that the Kiev regime struck a major deal with the United Arab Emirates for military weapons raises strong suspicions that the US-led NATO alliance has found a new backdoor into Ukraine. We say «new» because it is believed that the US and its NATO allies, Poland and Lithuania, are already covertly supplying weapons to the Kiev regime.
Kiev President Petro Poroshenko hailed the new strategic partnership with the Persian Gulf kingdom while attending the International Defence Exhibition (IDEX) in the UAE capital, Abu Dhabi. Poroshenko, who was royally received by UAE Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al Nayhan, declared himself a «president of peace» but that Ukraine, or rather the rump state that his regime commands, needed strong defence because of its «Russian enemy».
A giveaway to the real significance of the surprise development is that Poroshenko and his Arab hosts also reportedly held discreet meetings with Pentagon officials and US weapons manufacturing executives during the weapons exhibition. That indicates that Washington is coordinating the expected arms transfers.
Although the Kiev-UAE partnership lacked any public detail, one can safely assume that the Arab supply of weapons to Ukraine is simply a conduit for American and NATO military support to the Western-backed junta, which seized power in Ukraine last year in an illegal coup. Its war of aggression on the separatist eastern Ukraine has inflicted at least 6,000 deaths, mainly among the ethnic Russian civilian population.
Earlier this month it soon became clear that Washington and its NATO allies would pay a heavy political price for an audacious move to openly increase their military involvement in the Ukraine conflict. When Washington announced that it intended to go ahead with Congressional provisions to send «lethal aid» to Kiev there was much international consternation over such a reckless move.
Moscow warned Washington that any further military support to the reactionary, anti-Russian Kiev regime on its western border would constitute a «disastrous escalation». US President Barack Obama then appeared to back off from the proposal to supply lethal munitions.
America’s normally servile European allies also baulked at the Washington arms move. Germany, France and even Britain indicated disproval by stating that they would not be following suite by sending arms to Ukraine. Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel was perhaps the most forthright in her reservations. While on an official visit to Washington she reiterated her «no weapons» position to US media while being received in the White House by Obama.
No doubt a disgruntled European public reeling from economic austerity, unemployment and seething contempt for unaccountable EU leaders had a concentrating effect on the various political capitals to not throw more fuel on an already raging Ukrainian fire. The idea of going along with incendiary American militarism in Ukraine and further antagonising Russia would provoke a political storm across Europe. Hence the usually trusty European «yes men» had to defy Washington’s recklessness.
That incipient divergence between the US and EU appeared to unnerve Washington, with the latter fearing that its anti-Russian axis and sanctions tactics might be unravelling. President Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry were at pains to emphasise American-European «unity» over Ukraine and alleged «Russian aggression» – in spite of the fact that European leaders were, publicly at least, repudiating Washington’s weapons policy.
So, rather than risking an open split in the NATO ranks, Washington and its allies seem to have found an ingenious way around that problem – by getting the UAE to be the front end for weapons supplied to the Kiev regime.
Several media reports have talked up a «new defence industry» in the UAE. But whatever new industry there may be in the oil-rich kingdom, it is largely a value-adding or marketing platform for established Western manufacturers. The UAE defence sector is dominated by US military imports and American weapons giants, Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. The Emirati «partner» operations are a way for the royal rulers to claim kudos for diversifying the kingdom away from its economic dependence on oil exports by seemingly creating hi-tech sectors. For the Western weapons firms, the Arab retail image can provide a convenient public relations cover for global arms-dealing. American and European weapons can thus be sold to parts of the world where it might otherwise be viewed as unethical – thanks to these sales being booked as originating from the UAE.
Posted Feb 26, 2015
Sources: Free Internet