My Common Sense Politics
Posted by Preston James, Ph.D
on February 27, 2015
The US Department of State is in a complete tizzy-fit about Edward Snowden's disclosures of incredible NSA crimes and its Secret War against Americans and the World on behalf of their owners and controllers, the Khazarian Mafia Chieftains.
This US Department of State news conference by this slick very attractive lady who is lying through her teeth is one of the best examples of “Evil with a Nice Face” one could ever imagine.
Her little State Department performance actually sets a whole new standard for Evil with a Nice Face, and is a perfect example of that which was presented in Evil with a Nice Face Part I.
Yes, this very attractive US Department of State spokesperson is such a happy phony, good looking, slick, two-faced liar on behalf of the USG and the NSA, that no typical uninformed American News Consumer could never imagine that her command performance is designed deceive and conceal.
They are Obsessed with punishing Snowden for revealing their espionage and crimes against We The People.
The NSA and its partner in RICO crime and espionage, the US Department of State is obsessed with punishing and shutting Snowden up forever in a deep underground super-max prison. They are obsessed with getting Edward Snowden back in the US where he can be tried in a Kangaroo Court also known as a “national Security Court” with a hand-picked incredible biased Jury of either mind-kontrolled USG Koolaid drinkers or individuals adequately dirtied up.
These dirty “stacked” Juries are the type so often used by crooked US Prosecutors, many of whom themselves are known perpetrators operating as part of a large US Department of Justice RICO Crime Syndicate.
The US Department of Justice has been scared witless for years about Juries ever finding out about any Juror’s Constitutional Right of “Jury Nullification.” This is his/her right to vote not guilty if he/she thinks any law is morally wrong or the prosecution is unjust for any reason at all. When activists attempt to pass out Jury Nullification literature to folks entering or leaving Courthouses (which by the way is their Constitutional Right) they are almost forced to leave by Police threatening arrest or then are actually illegally arrested.
Jury Nullification is a Constitutional Right and soon all potential Jurors will know.
Soon the public knowledge of this Constitutional Right of Jury Nullification will be spreading like wildfire all over the Internet and every Juror will know about it even though all Judges prevent any attorney from mentioning it even though they are breaking the law to do so. No Jury of peers that was not cherry picked by dirty prosecutors would ever convict Snowden of anything if they knew their right to “Nullify.”
In the not too distant future, no convictions of any Snowden or recreational drug user will be possible.
Soon due to legalization of recreational pot use and the spreading of knowledge about the right of any Juror to use his/her nuclear option Jury Nullification, few recreational drug users will be able to be convicted at all. And this process will become even more salient as the public becomes informed of how many USG officials and the NSA are operating as a part of a large international Organized Crime cabal and also as a RICO crime syndicate, and must be brought to justice.
This is why our criminals in Congress and the USG worked so hard to get the illegal, Unconstitutional Patriot Act passed, so they could eliminate any right to a trial by Jury and just kidnap and incarcerate folks at Black Prison sites, never to be heard of again. Of course these Perps do not want this done to them, but maybe it should be at least for a while to give them a taste of their own sadism.
Snowden is not the Perp here who should be prosecuted for espionage, it’s the NSA!
Instead of being obsessed with prosecuting Snowden for whistle-blowing, how about getting obsessed with bringing all the NSA top Officials responsible for all this massive illegal Unconstitutional NSA spying and espionage against Americans to justice and final judgement with prejudice? This State Department spokesperson is expressing incredible hypocrisy and must be exposed for these “in your face” blatant lies and deceptions on behalf of the NSA and her controllers.
Yes, how about the US Department of Justice being cleaned out of its corrupts rats and then prosecuting the NSA Kingpins for massive espionage against Americans, and for their Treason, Sedition and RICO, all done on behalf of a foreign entity, the large Organized Crime Cabal, the Khazarian Mafia?
What was the real truth this State Department Spokesperson was concealing from the American People with her bald-faced Big Government Lies, Propaganda and False-narratives?
Fevruary 27, 2015
The FBI and major media outlets yesterday trumpeted the agency’s latest counterterrorism triumph: the arrest of three Brooklyn men, ages 19 to 30, on charges of conspiring to travel to Syria to fight for ISIS (photo of joint FBI/NYPD press conference, above). As my colleague Murtaza Hussain ably documents, “it appears that none of the three men was in any condition to travel or support the Islamic State, without help from the FBI informant.” One of the frightening terrorist villains told the FBI informant that, beyond having no money, he had encountered a significant problem in following through on the FBI’s plot: his mom had taken away his passport. Noting the bizarre and unhinged ranting of one of the suspects, Hussain noted on Twitter that this case “sounds like another victory for the FBI over the mentally ill.”
In this regard, this latest arrest appears to be quite similar to the overwhelming majority of terrorism arrests the FBI has proudly touted over the last decade. As my colleague Andrew Fishman and I wrote last month — after the FBI manipulated a 20-year-old loner who lived with his parents into allegedly agreeing to join an FBI-created plot to attack the Capitol — these cases follow a very clear pattern:
The known facts from this latest case seem to fit well within a now-familiar FBI pattern whereby the agency does not disrupt planned domestic terror attacks but rather creates them, then publicly praises itself for stopping its own plots.
First, they target a Muslim: not due to any evidence of intent or capability to engage in terrorism, but rather for the “radical” political views he expresses. In most cases, the Muslim targeted by the FBI is a very young (late teens, early 20s), adrift, unemployed loner who has shown no signs of mastering basic life functions, let alone carrying out a serious terror attack, and has no known involvement with actual terrorist groups.
They then find another Muslim who is highly motivated to help disrupt a “terror plot”: either because they’re being paid substantial sums of money by the FBI or because (as appears to be the case here) they are charged with some unrelated crime and are desperate to please the FBI in exchange for leniency (or both). The FBI then gives the informant a detailed attack plan, and sometimes even the money and other instruments to carry it out, and the informant then shares all of that with the target. Typically, the informant also induces, lures, cajoles, and persuades the target to agree to carry out the FBI-designed plot. In some instances where the target refuses to go along, they have their informant offer huge cash inducements to the impoverished target.
Once they finally get the target to agree, the FBI swoops in at the last minute, arrests the target, issues a press release praising themselves for disrupting a dangerous attack (which it conceived of, funded, and recruited the operatives for), and the DOJ and federal judges send their target to prison for years or even decades (where they are kept in special GITMO-like units). Subservient U.S. courts uphold the charges by applying such a broad and permissive interpretation of “entrapment” that it could almost never be successfully invoked.
Once again, we should all pause for a moment to thank the brave men and women of the FBI for saving us from their own terror plots.
One can, if one really wishes, debate whether the FBI should be engaging in such behavior. For reasons I and many others have repeatedly argued, these cases are unjust in the extreme: a form of pre-emptory prosecution where vulnerable individuals are targeted and manipulated not for any criminal acts they have committed but rather for the bad political views they have expressed. They end up sending young people to prison for decades for “crimes” which even their sentencing judges acknowledge they never would have seriously considered, let alone committed, in the absence of FBI trickery. It’s hard to imagine anyone thinking this is a justifiable tactic, but I’m certain there are people who believe that. Let’s leave that question to the side for the moment in favor of a different issue.
Sat, Feb 28th, 2015
The announcement this week that the Kiev regime struck a major deal with the United Arab Emirates for military weapons raises strong suspicions that the US-led NATO alliance has found a new backdoor into Ukraine. We say «new» because it is believed that the US and its NATO allies, Poland and Lithuania, are already covertly supplying weapons to the Kiev regime.
Kiev President Petro Poroshenko hailed the new strategic partnership with the Persian Gulf kingdom while attending the International Defence Exhibition (IDEX) in the UAE capital, Abu Dhabi. Poroshenko, who was royally received by UAE Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al Nayhan, declared himself a «president of peace» but that Ukraine, or rather the rump state that his regime commands, needed strong defence because of its «Russian enemy».
A giveaway to the real significance of the surprise development is that Poroshenko and his Arab hosts also reportedly held discreet meetings with Pentagon officials and US weapons manufacturing executives during the weapons exhibition. That indicates that Washington is coordinating the expected arms transfers.
Although the Kiev-UAE partnership lacked any public detail, one can safely assume that the Arab supply of weapons to Ukraine is simply a conduit for American and NATO military support to the Western-backed junta, which seized power in Ukraine last year in an illegal coup. Its war of aggression on the separatist eastern Ukraine has inflicted at least 6,000 deaths, mainly among the ethnic Russian civilian population.
Earlier this month it soon became clear that Washington and its NATO allies would pay a heavy political price for an audacious move to openly increase their military involvement in the Ukraine conflict. When Washington announced that it intended to go ahead with Congressional provisions to send «lethal aid» to Kiev there was much international consternation over such a reckless move.
Moscow warned Washington that any further military support to the reactionary, anti-Russian Kiev regime on its western border would constitute a «disastrous escalation». US President Barack Obama then appeared to back off from the proposal to supply lethal munitions.
America’s normally servile European allies also baulked at the Washington arms move. Germany, France and even Britain indicated disproval by stating that they would not be following suite by sending arms to Ukraine. Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel was perhaps the most forthright in her reservations. While on an official visit to Washington she reiterated her «no weapons» position to US media while being received in the White House by Obama.
No doubt a disgruntled European public reeling from economic austerity, unemployment and seething contempt for unaccountable EU leaders had a concentrating effect on the various political capitals to not throw more fuel on an already raging Ukrainian fire. The idea of going along with incendiary American militarism in Ukraine and further antagonising Russia would provoke a political storm across Europe. Hence the usually trusty European «yes men» had to defy Washington’s recklessness.
That incipient divergence between the US and EU appeared to unnerve Washington, with the latter fearing that its anti-Russian axis and sanctions tactics might be unravelling. President Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry were at pains to emphasise American-European «unity» over Ukraine and alleged «Russian aggression» – in spite of the fact that European leaders were, publicly at least, repudiating Washington’s weapons policy.
So, rather than risking an open split in the NATO ranks, Washington and its allies seem to have found an ingenious way around that problem – by getting the UAE to be the front end for weapons supplied to the Kiev regime.
Several media reports have talked up a «new defence industry» in the UAE. But whatever new industry there may be in the oil-rich kingdom, it is largely a value-adding or marketing platform for established Western manufacturers. The UAE defence sector is dominated by US military imports and American weapons giants, Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. The Emirati «partner» operations are a way for the royal rulers to claim kudos for diversifying the kingdom away from its economic dependence on oil exports by seemingly creating hi-tech sectors. For the Western weapons firms, the Arab retail image can provide a convenient public relations cover for global arms-dealing. American and European weapons can thus be sold to parts of the world where it might otherwise be viewed as unethical – thanks to these sales being booked as originating from the UAE.
Posted Feb 26, 2015
Sources: Free Internet
Posted by Gilad Atzmon
on February 26, 2015
95% of British Muslims here are “loyal to the Kingdom.”
A month ago we learned that “a quarter of Jews in Britain have considered leaving the country in the last two years and well over half feel they have no long term future in Europe”*
Interestingly enough, yesterday the BBC published a poll that measured British Muslims’ attitude towards Britain. Unlike the majority of Jews who expressed their will to leave Europe, 95% of the Muslims here are “loyal to Britain.”
In spite of Britain’s waging countless wars against Muslim countries for decades, despite Britain’s blind support for Israel and despite the ongoing discrimination against Muslims in Britain, nineteen out of twenty Muslims remain loyal to this Kingdom.
Contrast this with at least half the of Jews who, although they enjoy prominence in this country and whose Israeli Lobby has enjoyed remarkable success, appear willing to leave this country behind.
This raises the following questions, that a sociologist or perhaps the British Jews themselves must address.
What is it about British Jews, that has caused so many of them to fail to settle after so many decades? Why are they happy to wander again? Is the notion of dwelling foreign to Jewish culture? Is true assimilation impossible as far as Diaspora Jewish culture is concerned? Is it possible that it is actually the prominence of Jews in British society (media, politics, culture, finance) that makes Jews feel insecure?
Early Zionists attempted to address these questions. Settlement in Zion, i.e. Palestine, was supposed to free the Jews from their ‘Diaspora symptoms.’ The ‘homecoming’ adventure was supposed to introduce Jews to the notion of dwelling and belonging.
It was intended to attach the Jew to the soil. However, the birth of the Jewish State brought to light new and far more devastating traits some of which have actually put our planet at grave risk.
I guess that for the time being, there is NO answer to the Jewish question, yet, the question itself is more vital than ever.
*Poll: Most British Jews feel they have no future in Europe - Israel Jewish Scene, Ynetnews
Jewish Scene: A quarter of Jews in Britain considered leaving the country in the last 2 years; at least 45% of Britons agree with at least one anti-Semitic sentiment.
Additionally, anti-Semitic beliefs are widely prevalent among the wider public with 45 percent of Britons agreeing with at least one anti-Semitic sentiment, the YouGov poll for the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) group found.
The survey comes a week after four French Jews were killed in an attack on a Kosher supermarket in Paris which led to police stepping up security at synagogues and other Jewish venues across Britain.
Protest against anti-Semitism in London (Photo: AFP)
"Whilst anti-Semitism in Britain is not yet at the levels seen in most of Europe, the results of our survey should be a wakeup call," said Gideon Falter, chairman of the CAA in a foreword to its report.
"Britain is at a tipping point: unless anti-Semitism is met with zero tolerance, it will continue to grow and British Jews may increasingly question their place in their own country."
Last July, the Community Security Trust, which provides security advice to Britain's estimated 260,000 Jews, said anti-Semitic incidents in Britain had risen to a near record level amid fighting between Israeli forces and Palestinians in Gaza.
According to the CAA's poll of 2,230 British Jews, 58 percent felt Jews might have no long-term future in Europe, 45 percent felt their family was threatened by Islamist extremism and more than half had witnessed more anti-Semitism in the last two years than ever before.
Protest against anti-Semitism in London (Photo: AFP) The survey of the wider public found a quarter of Britons believed "Jews chase money more than other British people", and one in six agreed that "Jews think they are better than other people" and "Jews have too much power in the media". In all, 45 percent of the 3,411 questioned believed at least one anti-Semitic statement shown to them to be true.
France has posted almost 5,000 extra police officers to protect Jewish sites after last week's killings, and on Tuesday, British Prime Minister David Cameron met Jewish leaders to reassure them and see if there was more that could be done to ensure their safety. "I think we have to recognise that in a modern democracy you can never protect every threat but we should do everything we can and be as vigilant as we can to help reassure," he told them.
Source for lower half article: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4614990,00.html
By Brandon Martinez
February 24, 2015
Israel has essentially used the United States as a cat’s paw in the Middle East, manipulating America’s Leviathan military to smash up her enemies.
“Islam and the West at War,”readsreads a recent New York Times headline.
It would certainly seem that way if one were to take at face value the putrid assertions of Western governments that are not particularly known for their honesty or integrity. But astute observers of history and geopolitics can spot a deception when they see one, and the latest theatrical performances being marketed to the masses as real, organic occurrences remind one of a Monty Python sketch.
In the past week we have witnessed a number of expedient events that were designed to legitimize the West’s imperialist foreign policies in the minds of the masses. On Feb. 15 the Islamic State (also known as ISIS) released another highly choreographed and visually striking video allegedly depicting the beheading of 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians. Shortly following the video’s release, the Egyptian dictator Abdel Fattah el-Sissi launched air strikes against ISIS targets in Libya where the execution video was allegedly filmed, although experts are now saying that the production was faked.
ISIS’s continued provocations in the form of carefully crafted, emotionally impactful execution videos (real or faked), such as the recent immolation of a caged Jordanian pilot, cannot possibly be the work of rational actors seeking a military victory in any capacity. The videos only ever work to ISIS’s disadvantage, solidifying the resolve of their current ‘coalition’ opponents as well as creating new enemies upon every release.
Sixty-two countries and groups are presently fighting in the dubious ‘coalition’ against ISIS, most of which have modern militaries with advanced air and ground forces. Why in the world does ISIS continue to entice more countries to join the already over-crowded alliance against them? Why a group that purports to want to establish a ‘state’ which will ostensibly govern millions of people is deliberately seeking more and more enemies and a constant state of war with them beggars belief.
Does ISIS think it can do battle with the whole planet and achieve victory, culminating in world domination? How do people who harbor such ridiculous delusions have the wherewithal and resources at their disposal to organize and recruit thousands of fighters from around the world to an utterly ludicrous cause doomed to sheer failure? How can this be anything but a contrived prank of an operation?
The only logical conclusion that many analysts have come to is that ISIS does not represent a grassroots, organic movement, but rather operates entirely as a cat’s paw of Western foreign policy in the Middle East and North Africa, which is concurrently under the domination of Israel. ISIS’s actions expressly benefit Muslims least of all and Israel/the West most of all, the extent of which increases with every new atrocity and outrage ISIS inflicts upon innocents in Iraq and Syria that gets endless play in Western media. In fact, the Western media’s obsession with ISIS is in and of itself an effective form of PR for the group. Western media outlets are consciously performing an unqualified service for ISIS’s recruiting efforts by affording the terrorist group ‘premium level branding’ that will attract criminally-inclined degenerates, Wahhabist religious zealots and disaffected, suicidal lowlifes from around the world to join a cause predestined to abject failure.
This senile ‘ISIS vs. The World’ spectacle is little more than a melodramatic screenplay engineered in a boardroom by professional propagandists and marketing aficionados. It resembles a classic ‘problem, reaction, solution’ dialectic of deceit. Who in their right mind believes the rancid mythology surrounding this orchestrated ‘good vs. evil’ Hollywood blockbuster?
Proxy Warriors: Cannon Fodder for the Empire
The West is not sincerely at odds with ISIS nor is it seeking to “degrade and destroy” the group, as US President Barrack Obama claims. One piece of information that undermines this good cop/bad cop puppet show is the West’s clandestine support of ISIS beginning with the artificial uprising in Libya. In 2011, the West openly sought to depose Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi, and did so by backing ISIS and al-Qaeda-affiliated rebel groups to do it. The maniac rebels who sodomized and then murdered Gaddafi in the street like a dog were hailed as ‘freedom fighters’ by the repellant thugs in Washington, Paris and London, and were fully aided and abetted with NATO air strikes against Gaddafi’s forces. The rebel victory in Libya was only made possible through Western military intervention. “We came, we saw, he died,” said Obama’s former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton in reference to the assassination of Gaddafi by Washington’s foot soldiers, cackling like a witch at the demise of the Libyan potentate.
In a Nov. 19, 2014, article for Global Research, analyst Tony Cartalucci noted that the “so-called ‘rebels’ NATO had backed [in Libya] were revealed to be terrorists led by Al Qaeda factions including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).” During the manufactured ‘uprising’ Gaddafi routinely declared in public speeches that al-Qaeda was leading the way. “Gaddafi blames uprising on al-Qaeda,” read one Al Jazeera headline from February 2011. A March 2011 Guardian report spoke of how “hundreds of convicted members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), an al-Qaida affiliate, have been freed and pardoned” under a “reform and repent” program headed by Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam. The same article acknowledged that the LIFG, which was established in Afghanistan in the 1990s, “has assassinated dozens of Libyan soldiers and policemen” since its founding and that Britain’s MI6 had previously supported the group. That group formed the backbone of the anti-Gaddafi insurgency, and received all manner of support from the West and allied Gulf sheikhdoms.
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
Rules governing the commercial use of drones contain loopholes that would allow law enforcement agencies to deploy domestic drones without a warrant in some cases. (Image: via Shutterstock)
In about two years, the number of municipal police departments and federal agencies using unmanned aerial systems (UAS) for surveillance purposes is expected to skyrocket as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) streamlines the process by which a drone operator can apply for a permit.
The FAA released proposed rules governing the commercial use of UAS on February 15 in a move widely expected to give thousands of businesses and public agencies the green light to use UAS for work purposes sometime in 2017, after the rules undergo a lengthy public review process. The White House simultaneously released an executive order February 15 intended to safeguard privacy and civil rights by directing federal agencies to publicly disclose information about how they use UAS in domestic airspace.
The proposed rules, which apply to drones that weigh only 55 pounds or less, would make it much easier not only for police departments, but also a variety of businesses, including journalists, photographers and agricultural workers, to fly domestic drones for work purposes. The FAA is currently working on a separate set of rules for larger drones, which the agency is expected to release in a few years.
Under the rules, operators will be required to pass a proficiency exam, and pay about $200 in fees to register their drone. Operators will have to fly their drones at speeds of less than 100 miles-per-hour, at altitudes under 500 feet, during daylight hours only and within either their own unaided line of sight or within the eyesight of designated observers on the ground.
The White House's executive order directs federal agencies using domestic drones to draft a policy framework governing oversight and transparency of UAS use within 90 days. The directive outlines guidelines for data retention and dissemination of policies, as well as reporting requirements which mandate public disclosure of how federal agencies use UAS. But the executive order doesn't go far enough in the eyes of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), despite being described as a step in the right direction.
Neema Singh Guliani, who is legislative counsel with the ACLU, praised the White House's directive for its public reporting requirements, saying the requirements will allow greater public discourse and debate about the appropriate uses of domestic drones by federal agencies. She also celebrated the fact that federal agencies will be mandated to draft policy frameworks on UAS use, because many of those agencies currently have no such policy framework. However, Guliani said the directive alone isn't sufficient to protect people's privacy from the particularly invasive surveillance opportunities that domestic drones represent as used by law enforcement agencies.
While federal agencies will be required to create a basic framework regulating domestic drone use, each agency will be developing those guidelines separately, which could lead to inconsistency or deficient standards within some agencies, according to Guliani.
She also took issue with certain aspects of the directive's information-sharing rules, saying they were vague on the question of whether or not federal agencies can share information unrelated to the reason the data was collected by UAS in the first place. The executive order outlines that agencies can use UAS for any "authorized purpose," but the order does not outline exactly what an "authorized purpose" is.
February 23, 2015
By Jaime Fuller
Former Obama aide and well-known X-Files obsessive John Podesta tweeted this month that his "biggest failure of 2014" was "Once again not securing the #disclosure of the UFO files."
Many assume that Podesta will soon sign up for the still-hypothetical Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, which means that the UFO lobby might just endorse Clinton for a second time if decides to run.
Stephen Bassett, head of the Paradigm Research Group (which runs a blog about presidential UFO news and hosted an off-brand hearing for ex-members of Congress on government transparency in matters extraterrestrial), told the Huffington Post in 2007 that Hillary Clinton "knows this issue is not trivial." Nearly eight years later, Bassett is still trying to access any government documents on UFOs, and still hoping that Clinton will reach out to constituents like him.
Roll Call published a story about Bassett's efforts on Monday morning, which ended with the lobbyist's thoughts on the 2016 election. He doesn't see a path to victory for Hillary Clinton that does not involve discussing the potential of celestial circumnavigation.
“As far as I’m concerned … Hillary Clinton is not going to become the president of the United States without going through the extraterrestrial issue," Bassett told Roll Call. "Period."
Clinton could always outsource discussions of aliens to another high-profile space expert on her team. Bill Clinton recently disclosed that he did not find any evidence of extraterrestrial life at Roswell or Area 51 during his presidency.
Bassett also suggested that Republican candidates should also support a pro-transparency UFO agenda, before Russian President Vladimir Putin beats them to it. "If Bassett wants to reach out to the GOP, 2016 hopeful and noted Putin hater Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), who heads the Senate Subcommittee on Space, Science, and Competitiveness, might be a good person to start with. "
Life beyond Earth has been a reliable recurring feature of presidential coverage. In 2012, Newt Gingrich, who had an uncredited appearance as an alien in Men in Black, vowed to build a permanent base on the moon. During a 2008 presidential debate, Dennis Kucinich discussed his UFO sighting, and Sen. Barack Obama said that he did not know if there was life out there. During a 1992 presidential debate, Independent candidate Ross Perot managed to bring extraterrestrial life into a discussion about gridlock. "It's not the Republicans' fault, of course, and it's not the Democrats' fault. Somewhere out there there's an extraterrestrial that's doing this to us, I guess."
In 1997, CNN found that 80 percent of Americans thought the government was hiding information about aliens. Ninety-three percent of respondents had never been abducted by aliens or known someone who had been kidnapped and taken to another universe.
Administrative Note: Speak out and "Mickey's Nazified Zionista Imperialism Machine" and you'll get targeted like Malaysia, France, Denmark, Venezuela, Argentina and other countries who critizes USA & Israeli actions. There should be a UN EMBARGO on Israel UNTILL they are ALL back within their 1967 borders. That will likely never happen unless people around the world demand declassification of 911 files linking Saudia Arabia, Israel MOSSAD and Washington's Corrupted Shaddow Government aided and enabled as co-conspiraters Criminal Mass Media Cia Controlled Corpwhorational Crapititalized Control Complex.
Until the 1% are judged like the 99% there will be no "LIBERTY" only continuation of "Liberty"
Posted by Veterans Today
on February 24, 2015
“The Iraqi Parliament’s National Security and Defense Committee has access to the photos of both planes that are British and have crashed while they were carrying weapons for the ISIL,” Head of the committee Hakem al-Zame British li said, according to a Monday report of the Arabic-language information center of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq.
He said the Iraqi parliament has asked London for explanations in this regard.
The senior Iraqi legislator further unveiled that the government in Baghdad is receiving daily reports from people and security forces in al-Anbar province on numerous flights by the US-led coalition planes that airdrop weapons and supplies for ISIL in terrorist-held areas.
The Iraqi lawmaker further noted the cause of such western aids to the terrorist group, and explained that the US prefers a chaotic situation in Anbar Province which is near the cities of Karbala and Baghdad as it does not want the ISIL crisis to come to an end.
Earlier today, a senior Iraqi provincial official lashed out at the western countries and their regional allies for supporting Takfiri terrorists in Iraq, revealing that US and Israeli-made weapons have been discovered from the areas purged of ISIL terrorists.
“We have discovered weapons made in the US, European countries and Israel from the areas liberated from ISIL’s control in Al-Baqdadi region,” the Al-Ahad news website quoted Head of Al-Anbar Provincial Council Khalaf Tarmouz as saying.
He noted that the weapons made by the European countries and Israel were discovered from the terrorists in the Eastern parts of the city of Ramadi.
Al-Zameli had also disclosed in January that the anti-ISIL coalition’s planes have dropped weapons and foodstuff for the ISIL in Salahuddin, Al-Anbar and Diyala provinces.
Al-Zameli underlined that the coalition is the main cause of ISIL’s survival in Iraq.
“There are proofs and evidence for the US-led coalition’s military aid to ISIL terrorists through air(dropped cargoes),” he told FNA in January.
He noted that the members of his committee have already proved that the US planes have dropped advanced weaponry, including anti-aircraft weapons, for the ISIL, and that it has set up an investigation committee to probe into the matter.
“The US drops weapons for the ISIL on the excuse of not knowing about the whereabouts of the ISIL positions and it is trying to distort the reality with its allegations.